Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official pull-requestgithub-cligitsapling-scmcode-review

Codex Pull Request Editor

Professionally update one or more GitHub pull request titles and bodies around motivation, net changes, and verification.

FollowSkills review · FSRS-2.0
Not recommended
50/ 100 5-point scale 2.5 / 5
Trust17 / 25 · 3.4/5

The skill explicitly uses gh to edit PR title and body, requires checking and preserving existing images, and prohibits local absolute paths and confidential information, showing useful data-flow boundaries. It does not require user confirmation, least-privilege configuration, pre-change backup, or rollback, so points are deducted.

Reliability8 / 20 · 2.0/5

The document covers ordinary Git, Sapling, stacked PRs, and body-rewrite rules, including preservation of important content. However, it depends on git, gh, sl, and remote PR state, without diagnostic or recovery guidance for missing tools, absent PR associations, permission failures, or command errors; static calibration keeps this at or below 10.

Adaptability8 / 15 · 2.7/5

The target scenario and main inputs—an explicit PR or the current branch/commit—are reasonably clear, and stacked Sapling workflows are addressed. Non-fit cases, exclusion triggers, Windows or Chinese-language support, and behavior in network-restricted environments are not specified, so points are deducted.

Convention6 / 15 · 2.0/5

The front matter is concise and the sections are readable, with guidance for safe writing, stacked PRs, and Sapling. It lacks installation/dependency notes, a parameter contract, examples, FAQs, versioning, changelog, maintenance ownership, and update path. Apache-2.0 licensing and OpenAI provenance are visible only from repository context, so points are deducted.

Effectiveness7 / 15 · 2.3/5

The skill directly targets updating PR titles and bodies and specifies why/what ordering, net-change scope, verification notes, Markdown conventions, and documentation follow-up. Its output value is clear, but there is no output template, post-edit verification, or usable failure result, and static review cannot establish successful execution; the score is capped at 7.

Verifiability4 / 10 · 2.0/5

The source is auditable and provides textual support for its key behaviors. It contains no skill-specific tests, CI coverage, execution records, or third-party reproduction evidence, so only limited static verifiability is warranted.

Evidence confidence:Low Reviewed Jul 19, 2026 Reviewed revision 678157acaa81
The upstream repository has new commits since this review. The score still applies to the reviewed revision shown and may not cover the latest changes.
Before you use it
  • Execution has an external side effect: gh may directly modify a remote PR, but the skill does not explicitly require confirmation, backup, or rollback before editing.
  • The core flow depends on git/gh/sl, valid authentication, and network access; failure handling is underspecified when tools are unavailable, a PR cannot be resolved, or permissions are insufficient.
  • Chinese-language conventions and reachability or fallback behavior for mainland-China network restrictions are not documented.
See the full review method →

What it does & when to use it

This skill edits the title and body of one or more GitHub pull requests. It can infer a PR from the current branch or commit, or work from an explicitly specified PR, while checking the existing body for information that must be preserved. The rewritten body should explain why the change is being made, what the net change is, and how it was verified. It supports ordinary Git workflows, stacked pull requests, and Sapling-managed repositories.

Reads the current Git branch or commit and can use gh pr view to find its associated pull request; uses sl log or sl sl to inspect the associated GitHub pull request in Sapling repositories; checks the existing PR title and body; uses gh to update the title and body; preserves important existing content such as images; and writes the motivation, net change, relevant references, and verification details.

  1. A developer needs to add the motivation and verification details to the pull request for the current branch.
  2. A maintainer needs to revise the titles and bodies of one or more pull requests consistently.
  3. A team using stacked pull requests needs each body to describe only the net change relative to its actual base branch.
  4. A Sapling user needs to identify the GitHub pull request associated with the current revision.

Pros & cons

Pros
  • Covers PR discovery, existing-body review, and title/body editing in one workflow.
  • Explicitly protects existing images and other important information during rewriting.
  • Handles ordinary Git, stacked pull requests, and Sapling scenarios.
  • Produces collaboration-oriented bodies focused on motivation, net change, and verification.
Limitations
  • Requires the GitHub CLI `gh` and network access; it is not a text-only drafting skill.
  • The source does not specify detailed handling for authentication failures, missing pull requests, or permission errors.
  • No skill-specific test suite or verification results are provided in the source.
  • Its scope is limited to PR titles and bodies; it does not modify code or run tests.

How to install

The repository README does not document a standalone installation command for this skill. The skill file is located at .codex/skills/codex-pr-body/SKILL.md; place that directory in an Agent Skills-compatible client to make it available. The README documents installation of the overall Codex CLI, but does not say that this installs the skill separately.

How to use

In a client where the skill is available, use a request such as: Update the title and body of the pull request for my current branch, preserving existing images and explaining why, what changed, and how it was verified. For ordinary Git, the skill may combine git branch with gh pr view <branch> --repo openai/codex --json number --jq '.number' to find the PR. If .git/sl/store exists, use the documented Sapling inspection flow.

FAQ

Will this skill remove images from an existing pull request body?
No. It explicitly requires checking the existing body and never removing existing images.
Does it support stacked pull requests?
Yes. The body should describe the net change from the PR's actual base to its head, rather than defaulting to differences from `main`.
What tools does it require?
The source explicitly references Git, GitHub CLI `gh`, and the `sl` command for Sapling repositories, plus network access to GitHub.
Will it modify code or run tests?
No. Its scope is updating the pull request title and body and documenting relevant verification.

More skills from this repository

All from openai/codex

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

PR Babysitter

Continuously track a GitHub pull request’s reviews, CI, and mergeability while handling safe fixes.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Codex Issue Digest

Turns recent openai/codex bugs and enhancement requests into focused, owner-ready digests.

Design & Frontend ✓ OpenAI · Official

Codex Image Generation

Generate, edit, and prepare practical raster image assets directly within a project workflow.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Codex Plugin Builder

Scaffold, validate, and maintain standards-shaped plugins for Codex.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Codex Skill Installer

Install curated or repository-hosted Codex skills without manually assembling their files and paths.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

OpenAI Official Docs Assistant

Provides current, official-source guidance for OpenAI products, APIs, Codex, and model migrations.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Review Agent Code Review Skill

Find actionable regressions in code changes through a read-only, defect-first review.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Remote Executor Integration Tests

Validate Codex integration behavior across local and remote execution environments.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

V8 Version Maintainer

Updates Codex’s pinned V8 versions and validates release-candidate and build-failure paths.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Change Size Review Guide

Keep code changes reviewable by enforcing practical size limits and staging oversized work.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Codex Path Types Guide

Choose Rust path types that preserve cross-platform URI handling and local filesystem behavior in Codex.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Skill Creator Guide

A practical guide to designing, validating, and refining reusable Agent Skills.

Automation & Ops ✓ OpenAI · Official

CI Push Approval Assistant

Handle CI configuration push blocks and approval handoffs

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Code Review and Testing Guidance

Helps coding agents choose and structure tests for logic changes.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Codex Bug Triage Assistant

Determines whether an openai/codex GitHub bug should be verified, clarified, or explained as expected behavior.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Breaking Change Reviewer

Systematically detect compatibility risks across external integration surfaces before they reach users.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Codex TUI Interactive Testing Guide

A focused workflow for launching Codex TUI and validating changes with trace logs.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Context Governance

Keep coding-agent context incremental, cache-stable, and strictly bounded.

Dev & Engineering ✓ OpenAI · Official

Pull Request Code Review

Orchestrate a final pull request review and consolidate every actionable finding from specialized reviewers.

Related skills