DOCA Device Management Development Skill

The documentation explicitly requires least privilege, user confirmation, capability checks, pre-write state capture, narrowest command scope, maintenance windows, out-of-band access, replica-first validation, post-write verification, and rollback. Deducted 7 points because it provides no implemented permission isolation, confirmation mechanism, rollback executor, or detailed sensitive-data handling, and dependencies and external sources are not independently verified in the supplied material.

SKILL.md, CAPABILITIES.md, and TASKS.md give substantial guidance on prerequisites, context lifecycles, error taxonomy, failure routing, and abnormal-input feedback; BENCHMARK.md reports evaluation results. Deducted 12 points because nothing was executed here, the benchmark dataset is unavailable, there is no committed test suite covering key paths, and no reproducible CI evidence; several paths depend on omitted skills or an installed runtime environment.

The audience, scenarios, implicit trigger phrases, capability boundaries, and routing to telemetry, caps, bench, and setup skills are clearly described. Deducted 5 points because Chinese-language interaction, non-Linux or device-absent environments, and mainland-China network fit are not addressed; the core function does rely mainly on a local SDK and device rather than entirely on unreachable overseas services.

The skill uses a thin-loader plus CAPABILITIES.md/TASKS.md progressive-disclosure structure and documents examples, dependencies, limitations, error handling, version compatibility, and maintenance routing; SKILL.md declares Apache-2.0. Deducted 7 points because author, formal version, changelog, and explicit maintenance ownership are incomplete; SKILLCARD.yaml contains unsigned placeholders and conflicts with the target-path metadata on source path and licensing; BENCHMARK.md also records schema findings.

The supplied material covers context creation, capability queries, state modification, ICM quotas, raw_cmd, debugging, and safe change workflows, while the benchmark report claims strong skill-assisted correctness and effectiveness. Deducted 9 points because the evaluation dataset is unavailable and results cannot be independently checked; the skill supplies no compilable samples or templates, and usable output still depends on local installation, device state, version matching, and other skills.

The files provide concrete API names, error codes, command scopes, paths, and verification procedures, with cross-references among the skill files. Deducted 7 points because there is no executable test evidence, complete CI coverage, or independently reproducible benchmark dataset; the skill card's signature, version, and scan fields remain placeholders, limiting auditability.