Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official equity-researchearnings-analysisquarterly-resultsfinancial-modelingdocx-reportsdata-visualizationsource-citations

Earnings Update Researcher

Turn quarterly results into an institutional-style update focused on beats, estimate changes, valuation, and thesis impact.

FollowSkills review · FSRS-2.0
Not recommended
54/ 100 5-point scale 2.7 / 5
Trust14 / 25 · 2.8/5

The skill requires specific source attribution and clickable links for figures, tables, and key data, and scopes the work to quarterly updates for companies already under coverage. It requests no trading execution or destructive action. However, it relies on web search, SEC filings, third-party consensus data, and external services without specifying least-privilege permissions, sensitive financial-data handling, user confirmation, rollback, or link-safety validation, so points are deducted.

Reliability8 / 20 · 2.0/5

The workflow, checklists, and date-mismatch rules provide useful guidance for the happy path and stale or inconsistent materials. Nevertheless, it depends on an undefined DOCX skill, web search, and potentially unavailable data sources; there are no skill-specific tests, reproduced outputs, or clear tool-failure handling. The score remains within the static-review ceiling and is reduced accordingly.

Adaptability10 / 15 · 3.3/5

Trigger phrases, target scenarios, and non-fit cases are relatively clear: the skill targets post-earnings updates for companies already covered and specifies report contents. Boundaries are incomplete when transcripts, consensus data, or prior coverage materials are unavailable. The templates assume English-language institutional research and Word output, do not declare Chinese support or mainland-China reachability, and rely on overseas web sources such as SEC, so points are deducted.

Convention10 / 15 · 3.3/5

The documentation has layered sections, phased workflow, citation rules, templates, quality checklists, and stable output naming. Repository evidence supplies an Apache-2.0 license, official provenance, and CI validation signals. The skill itself lacks a version, changelog, named maintenance owner, update path, dependency-install instructions, and FAQ; the referenced DOCX/XLS skills are also not concretely identified, so points are deducted.

Effectiveness7 / 15 · 2.3/5

The goal, report structure, estimate-update process, chart requirements, and delivery format are concrete and could support a standardized quarterly update. Static files cannot establish that the system actually creates a usable DOCX, embeds charts, calculates estimate changes correctly, or validates hyperlinks. Professional review remains necessary, so the score is capped by static calibration and reduced for the lack of execution evidence.

Verifiability5 / 10 · 2.5/5

The skill specifies source, date, quarter-consistency, consensus-data, and hyperlink checks, while repository CI provides plugin-validation and secret-scan evidence. There are no skill-specific tests, real execution artifacts, or independent third-party reviews covering the key path; static instructions alone cannot verify compliance, so points are deducted.

Evidence confidence:Low Reviewed Jul 19, 2026 Reviewed revision 4aa51ed3d379
Before you use it
  • The workflow depends on web search and several overseas data sources but provides no operational fallback for offline, restricted-network, or unavailable-source conditions.
  • The DOCX skill, XLS skill, and chart-generation environment are not defined within the assessed skill; humans should verify files, numbers, citations, hyperlinks, and estimate calculations before delivery.
  • Financial research may involve sensitive or regulated information, yet the skill does not specify data minimization, access control, retention, user confirmation, or publication approval.
  • The output specification is primarily an English institutional-research format and does not establish Chinese terminology, Chinese layout, or mainland-China network usability.
Review evidence [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
See the full review method →

What it does & when to use it

This skill produces 8–12-page, 3,000–5,000-word earnings update reports for companies already under coverage. It focuses on beat-or-miss analysis, key metrics, guidance changes, revised forward estimates, valuation, and the effect on the investment thesis. The specified format includes 1–3 summary tables, 8–12 charts, and clickable citations for figures, tables, and key statistics. The primary deliverable is a DOCX report, with an optional XLS model update.

Collects the latest earnings release, Form 10-Q, earnings call transcript, investor materials, consensus estimates, and prior guidance; checks the current date, release date, and transcript date before analysis; evaluates metric variances, segment performance, margins, guidance, estimate revisions, and thesis implications; uses Python with matplotlib, pandas, and seaborn for 8–12 charts; and creates a DOCX report containing an earnings summary, results analysis, guidance, thesis assessment, valuation, updated estimates, and a clickable sources section.

  1. An equity analyst covering a company who needs a report within 24–48 hours of its quarterly earnings release.
  2. A research team explaining why revenue, EPS, or operating metrics beat or missed market expectations.
  3. An analyst updating forward estimates and the investment thesis after new quarterly data.
  4. An institutional research team preparing a concise update for clients already familiar with the company.

Pros & cons

Pros
  • Provides clear output constraints for length, charts, tables, structure, and DOCX delivery.
  • Prioritizes beats or misses, estimate revisions, and thesis impact, making it suited to fast post-earnings work.
  • Requires specific sources and clickable links for figures, tables, and key data.
  • Defines a five-phase workflow covering collection, analysis, charting, report creation, and quality control.
Limitations
  • Limited to companies already under coverage and is not intended for initiation reports.
  • Not intended for flash notes or quick takes.
  • Requires Python charting libraries and a DOCX skill; no test suite or platform validation evidence is provided.
  • Requires web searching for current materials, but the source does not provide data-provider access.
  • The source specifies ratings and price targets in the report format but does not explain how to independently validate them.

How to install

The README says to install the collection in Cowork through Settings → Plugins → Add plugin by pasting https://github.com/anthropics/financial-services and selecting the relevant agent or vertical. For Claude Code, it documents: claude plugin marketplace add anthropics/financial-services, followed by installation of the relevant agent or the equity-research vertical plugin. The supplied material does not document a standalone installation command for this individual skill.

How to use

In an environment where the skill is installed and callable, use a prompt such as "Create an earnings update for [Company] Q3 2024", "Analyze [Company]'s quarterly results", or "Post-earnings report for [Company]". The company should already be under coverage; the workflow requires searching for the latest earnings, confirming the release is within the last three months, and checking that the transcript date matches the release date.

Compared to similar skills

Compared with an initiation report, this skill is shorter, faster, and focused on new quarterly information, with fewer tables and figures. Compared with a flash note or quick take, it requires a fuller 8–12-page report, 8–12 charts, updated estimates, and a complete sources section.

FAQ

Can it be used to initiate coverage of a company?
No. The SKILL.md explicitly requires the company to already be under coverage; initiation work uses a different skill.
What does it cost?
The supplied materials do not state pricing for the skill, plugin, or data sources.
Does it require network access?
Yes. The workflow requires searching for current earnings materials and citing releases, filings, transcripts, estimates, and prior guidance.
What happens if source dates do not align?
The workflow instructs the user to search again and verify that the release is less than three months old and that the transcript date matches the release date.

More skills from this repository

All from anthropics/financial-services

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Three-Statement Model Builder

Populate and validate linked income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow models with formulas.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Spreadsheet Auditor

Checks spreadsheet formulas, errors, and financial-model integrity.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Three-Statement Model Builder

Complete existing three-statement templates with linked formulas, projections, scenarios, and audit checks.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Comparable Company Valuation

Build institutional-grade peer valuation analyses with operating metrics, trading multiples, and statistical benchmarks in spreadsheets.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Competitive Landscape Analyst

Turn competitive research into an approved, comparable market landscape deck.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Sector Landscape Research

Structure industry dynamics, competition, valuation, and investment themes in one research workflow.

Productivity & Collaboration ✓ Anthropic · Official

PE Investment Committee Memo Writer

Turns diligence, financial analysis, and deal terms into a structured memo for private equity investment committee approval.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Excel Data Cleaning Assistant

Clean inconsistent spreadsheets before analysis.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Financial Deck Refresh

Update financial figures across an existing presentation while preserving its formatting and structure.

Writing & Content ✓ Anthropic · Official

IC Memo Drafting

Turns diligence and financial inputs into a structured IC memo.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Financial Model Auditor

Find spreadsheet formula errors and test financial-model integrity before review.

Automation & Ops ✓ Anthropic · Official

Reconciliation Break Tracer

Trace ledger breaks to source entries and state the operational root cause.

Automation & Ops ✓ Anthropic · Official

KYC Intake Parser

Turn onboarding packets into structured KYC data ready for screening.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Audit XLS: Spreadsheet Model Review

Systematically checks spreadsheet formulas, errors, and financial-model integrity issues.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

General Ledger Roll-Forward

Connects a balance-sheet account’s opening balance to its period-end GL balance for close packages and audit support.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Investment Banking Pitch Deck Filler

Populate existing investment banking PowerPoint templates with validated data from Excel, CSV, and other source files.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Three-Statement Model Filler

Complete and validate integrated three-statement templates with formulas, linkages, and audit checks.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Financial Model Audit

Systematically checks spreadsheet formulas and model integrity.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

GL–Subledger Reconciliation

Reconcile general ledger and subledger data, expose breaks, and suggest likely causes for investigation.

Data & Analysis ✓ Anthropic · Official

Investment Banking Pitch Deck Filler

Populate existing investment banking PowerPoint templates with verified data from Excel, CSV, and other source files.

Related skills