Data & Analysis literature-searchcitation-verificationpubmedcrossrefarxivscopussciencedirectmesh-strategycitation-file-managementreference-management

Academic Search & Citation Audit

A research skill for multi-source literature search, strict independent citation auditing, and high-impact citer profiling.

FollowSkills review · FSRS-2.0
Not recommended
58/ 100 5-point scale 2.9 / 5
1 2 3 4 5 6
1Trust18 / 25 · 3.6/5

Evidence: Install script modifies user's .mcp.json and settings.json with clear output, requires email; depends on external MCP services (PubMed etc.), no malicious behavior found. Deductions: writes config files without user confirmation; data flow (external network calls) not fully disclosed; publisher unverified, limited trust evidence.

2Reliability8 / 20 · 2.0/5

Evidence: CI workflow runs pytest for mcp-server, script tests exist. Static review cannot verify actual execution. Deductions: no test details or coverage; error handling descriptions generic; not up to reliability cap.

3Adaptability10 / 15 · 3.3/5

Evidence: README/SKILL.md clearly define use cases (multi-source search, strict other-citation audit), target users (researchers), inputs; triggers are rich and semantically clear. Deductions: no explicit non-fit scenarios; environment fit evidence limited; core depends on overseas services (PubMed, CrossRef) with reachability concerns from mainland China, though fallback mentioned.

4Convention12 / 15 · 4.0/5

Evidence: Complete bilingual READMEs with clear structure, boundaries, dependencies; Apache-2.0 license; version number in manifest. Deductions: no changelog or version history; maintenance responsibility unclear (publisher unverified); known limitations partially mentioned but may be incomplete.

5Effectiveness6 / 15 · 2.0/5

Evidence: Outputs described (deduplicated table, citation files, audit table), typical requests and inputs clear. Static review cannot verify direct usability. Deductions: no execution evidence for result correctness; comparative benefit over manual not quantified.

6Verifiability4 / 10 · 2.0/5

Evidence: CI workflow and script tests exist, but no test results or coverage; claims MCP support but no independent validation. Deductions: static review cannot run tests; only author-provided docs, no cross-source corroboration.

Evidence confidence:Low Reviewed Aug 07, 2026 Reviewed revision dfd4e3bf8dc5
The upstream repository has new commits since this review. The score still applies to the reviewed revision shown and may not cover the latest changes.
Before you use it
  • Install script directly modifies ~/.claude/.mcp.json and settings.json; review and backup these files before running.
  • Core functions depend on overseas services (PubMed, CrossRef, etc.); access from mainland China may fail or be slow; verify availability and consider fallbacks.
  • Publisher not enterprise-verified; rely on actual execution results, not brand trust.
See the full review method →

What does this skill do, and when should you use it?

nature-academic-search is a skill for academic workflows that coordinates multi-source literature search, citation verification, strict other-citation auditing, article-level citation metric tables, high-impact citer profiling (academy members, presidents, talent-award holders, fellows), MeSH search strategies, and citation file management (.nbib/.ris/.bib conversion) via MCP tools (PubMed, CrossRef, arXiv, Scopus, ScienceDirect). It uses a router architecture that detects the user's workflow and loads the matching workflow fragment, preferring to load fragments from disk rather than relying on memory. The skill emphasizes strict independent other-citation determination and supports both English and Chinese triggers.

Calls MCP tools to search literature across PubMed, CrossRef, arXiv, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. Verifies citations extracted from a document, performs strict independent other-citation audits, excludes self-citations, and builds article-level citation metric tables. Profiles high-impact citers (academy members, presidents/deans, talent-award holders, fellows, field leaders) and extracts the context in which they cited the target paper. Constructs MeSH/PubMed search strategies. Converts and manages .nbib/.ris/.bib citation files. Manages references, including BibTeX generation, related-article discovery, and ID conversion. Provides a no-MCP fallback discovery search script (academic_search.py) and a format converter script (format-converter.py).

  1. Graduate students need to find literature across multiple sources on a topic and build a MeSH search strategy for a systematic review in PubMed.
  2. Authors want to verify citations in their manuscript, ensuring DOIs are valid and that volume/page details match, and to flag citation errors.
  3. Researchers want to count citations and strict other-citations for their paper and check whether any citers are academic elite such as academy members or fellows.
  4. Scholars need to convert .nbib files to .ris or .bib to import into different reference managers.
  5. Editors reviewing a manuscript verify the authenticity and format of references and generate a summary table of citation metrics.

What are this skill's strengths and limitations?

Pros
  • Multi-source coverage across PubMed, CrossRef, arXiv, Scopus, ScienceDirect enhances literature recall.
  • Strict independent other-citation audit excludes self-citations, improving reliability.
  • High-impact citer profiling helps identify academic influence.
  • Router architecture loads only needed workflows, saving context.
  • Supports Chinese triggers, friendly to Chinese-speaking users.
  • Provides script fallback for basic search without MCP.
Limitations
  • Relies on MCP services and requires configuring multiple API credentials (PubMed email, Scopus, ScienceDirect), which raises setup overhead.
  • Scopus/ScienceDirect providers are not detailed in SKILL.md, requiring self-exploration.
  • No mention of automated tests or real-case validation coverage, so reliability is unverified.
  • Some features (like ID conversion) depend on external tools; fallback to manual generation can be time-consuming.

How do you install this skill?

Use npx skills to install the whole collection: npx skills add Yuan1z0825/nature-skills --global --agent codex --skill '*' --yes --copy. Or for Claude Code, clone the repository to a stable path and create a subagent or slash command wrapper pointing to skills/nature-academic-search/SKILL.md. Install Python dependencies: python -m pip install -r skills/nature-academic-search/mcp-server/requirements.txt.

How do you use this skill?

After installation, open a new session and describe your need in English or Chinese, e.g., 'Compile citation counts, strict other-citation counts, and DOI for this paper, and check if any citers are academy members, fellows, or field leaders.' The skill will detect the workflow and load the relevant instructions. Ensure MCP services are configured with PUBMED_EMAIL and credentials for Scopus/ScienceDirect if needed.

FAQ

Which literature databases does this skill support?
It supports PubMed, CrossRef, arXiv, Scopus, and ScienceDirect through MCP tools. Scopus and ScienceDirect are optional and require local credentials.
Does this cost money or require additional API purchases?
The skill itself is free and open-source, but Scopus and ScienceDirect typically require subscriptions or credentials. PubMed and CrossRef are free, though you need to configure an email.
Can the skill work without an MCP server?
It provides a no-MCP fallback script (academic_search.py) for basic discovery, but advanced functions like citation verification and other-citation auditing depend on MCP.
Is the skill usable for non-Chinese speakers?
The frontmatter includes Chinese descriptions, but the workflow logic is language-agnostic. Non-Chinese users can use it by describing tasks in English.

More skills from this repository

All from Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

Related skills