Writing & Content brand-narrativecompetitive-analysismessaging-strategymarket-researchwayback-archivemarketing

Category Narrative Map

Reveal the category stories, competitor messaging, and shifts shaping your position.

FollowSkills review · FSRS-2.0
Not recommended
58/ 100 5-point scale 2.9 / 5
Trust18 / 25 · 3.6/5

The skill explicitly treats fetched content as untrusted data, requires robots.txt preflight, labels proxy signals, prevents competitor assertions from becoming facts, and asks for confirmation before memory writes or claim promotion; however, Firecrawl/Tavily transmit target URLs and queries to third parties, while the actual registry authority boundary is delegated to external protocols. The skill itself lacks complete data-flow, rollback, and sensitive-data handling details, so points are deducted.

Reliability8 / 20 · 2.0/5

The contract, numbered procedure, done criteria, and termination rules are broadly consistent, with clear Measured/User-provided/Estimated/proxy distinctions; however, the key path depends on several connectors, archive services, and shared protocols without skill-specific tests, abnormal-input behavior, or diagnosable failure messages. The static ceiling is applied.

Adaptability11 / 15 · 3.7/5

Triggers, inputs, output components, competitor-set handling, adjacent-category coverage, and non-fit boundaries are clearly stated, with Chinese labeling and descriptions; however, core drift analysis depends on reachable scraping and Wayback services. Mainland-China availability is not established, and proxy or pasted-data fallbacks reduce coverage, so points are deducted.

Convention11 / 15 · 3.7/5

The file provides frontmatter, version, license, host compatibility, Quick Starts, an input/output contract, sources, procedure, save confirmation, handoff, and next-skill guidance; however, maintenance ownership, update path, changelog, dependency versions, and troubleshooting are not clear in the skill itself, and many key controls are externalized to referenced files not supplied here.

Effectiveness6 / 15 · 2.0/5

The intended output covers category stories, language conventions, per-competitor teardown, messaging drift, and handoff, which could directly support positioning work; however, static evidence cannot establish that scraping, archive comparison, or document production succeeds on real inputs. Results depend heavily on competitor URLs, archive availability, and user-supplied context, so the static ceiling applies and points are deducted.

Verifiability4 / 10 · 2.0/5

The skill requires source-type labels, URLs for Measured rows, and explicit separation of proxy signals from facts, providing some auditability; however, there are no skill-specific tests, third-party execution records, or documented multi-source reproductions. Repository tests mainly cover shared architecture and audit validation, not this skill's key paths, so points are deducted.

Evidence confidence:Low Reviewed Jul 20, 2026 Reviewed revision ebd436747f8f
The upstream repository has new commits since this review. The score still applies to the reviewed revision shown and may not cover the latest changes.
Before you use it
  • Scraping and search may send target URLs and queries to third parties such as Firecrawl/Tavily; do not provide confidential competitive leads or unpublished material.
  • If Wayback or scraping services are unavailable, drift analysis cannot meet the done criteria; mark the evidence missing instead of inferring historical changes.
  • The skill asks for confirmation before memory persistence while its done condition refers to saving; treat explicit user confirmation as mandatory before any durable write.
  • No skill-specific tests or execution records are provided, so the score does not establish runtime reliability or accuracy of marketing conclusions.
Review evidence [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
See the full review method →

What does this skill do, and when should you use it?

Category Narrative Mapper researches the narrative terrain of a market as the second move in the TALE Trace phase. It identifies dominant category stories, points of view, recurring language, framing clichés, and saturated terms, then breaks down each named competitor's arc, claimed onlyness, proof pattern, and primary frame. It also compares current competitor copy with dated archive snapshots to identify messaging drift. The skill produces a category narrative map; it does not build the positioning canvas, capture audience beliefs, adjudicate claims, or calculate a TALE result.

Confirms the category and competitor set, reuses prior competitor-analysis findings when available, and gathers public messaging through the repository's Firecrawl connector, Tavily search signals labeled proxy, and Wayback archive connector. It names two to four dominant category stories and catalogs recurring vocabulary, framing clichés, table-stakes language, and saturated language. For every named competitor, it records the narrative arc, claimed onlyness sentence, proof pattern, and primary framing, then adds a current-versus-archived messaging-drift note with as-of dates. Outputs are labeled Measured, User-provided, or Estimated and are written to memory/narrative/category-narrative-mapper/ only after the user confirms saving.

  1. A brand team is developing a new narrative and needs to understand the frames already used by the category.
  2. A market researcher needs a structured teardown of how several competitors tell their stories and prove them.
  3. A positioning lead wants to compare a competitor's current homepage messaging with archived versions.
  4. A content strategist needs to distinguish must-speak category language from overused framing clichés.
  5. A product marketing team needs category-frame candidates and named alternatives for downstream positioning work.

What are this skill's strengths and limitations?

Pros
  • Produces a focused map covering category stories, language conventions, competitor narratives, and messaging drift.
  • Separates Measured, User-provided, and Estimated evidence and labels search signals as proxy.
  • Supports current-copy versus Wayback archive comparisons.
  • Defines clear scope boundaries and hands off to downstream positioning work.
  • The repository is Apache-2.0 licensed and supports Claude Code plus compatible Agent Skills hosts.
Limitations
  • Requires public competitor pages or user-provided material; closed social platforms are limited to pasted excerpts or proxy reads.
  • Does not build the positioning canvas, adjudicate claims, or compute the TALE profile result.
  • Scraping and archive comparisons depend on the Firecrawl, Tavily, and Wayback connectors; the supplied material does not provide per-connector test results.
  • Persistent memory writes require user confirmation.
  • No standalone test suite for this individual skill is shown in the source material.

How do you install this skill?

Clone the repository with git clone https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills. In Claude Code, run /plugin marketplace add aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills and then /plugin install aaron-marketing@aaron. The README also supports npx skills add aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills for Agent Skills-compatible hosts. The supplied material gives a single-skill installation example but does not show this skill's exact standalone command.

How do you use this skill?

Use a prompt such as “Map the category narrative for [product/category]. Competitors: [names]” or “Tear down how [Competitor A], [Competitor B] tell their story — arc, claimed onlyness, proof pattern.” For historical comparison, use “Show how [competitor]'s messaging has shifted over the last 2 years — scrape their site now and compare against the archive.” Provide the category, product, and competitor names or URLs.

FAQ

Do I need a paid competitive-intelligence tool?
No. The source describes Tier 1 as working with pasted data or free and public sources, and lists Firecrawl, Tavily, and Wayback connectors for this workflow.
Does it treat competitor claims as facts?
No. Comparative claims that a user might repeat are marked [needs source] and routed for proposal; this skill does not adjudicate them.
Will it change the brand canon or memory automatically?
No. It does not write canonical narrative-registry files, and it asks for confirmation before saving results to persistent memory.
When should I use another skill?
Use the repository's other specialized skills for positioning canvases, audience beliefs, SERP keyword targeting, claim adjudication, or TALE scoring.

More skills from this repository

All from aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills

Writing & Content

Audience Belief Mapper

Turn interview and win-loss evidence into a beachhead belief, objection, and switching-forces map.

Writing & Content

Narrative Quality Gate

Audit brand-narrative truth, system coherence, and effectiveness evidence as separate profiles.

Writing & Content

Message Test Designer

Validate whether brand messages land with target buyers before scaling paid spend.

Writing & Content

Positioning Mapper

Define the alternatives, differentiated value, beachhead segment, and launch positioning before writing launch copy.

Writing & Content

Positioning Truth Tracer

Reconcile positioning claims with what the product can ship and prove, producing a defensible differentiation set.

Writing & Content

Narrative Cascade Planner

Map an approved brand narrative across every marketing surface and hand precise briefs to the teams that build them.

Writing & Content

Narrative Baseline Mapper

Inventory what every owned brand surface says now, expose gaps against intended messaging, and freeze a baseline for future narrative-drift checks.

Writing & Content

Brand Language Codifier

Turn a brand’s published language into reusable voice, lexicon, and product-naming rules.

Writing & Content

Share of Voice Tracker

Measure and trend brand share of voice against a locked competitor panel across platforms and periods.

Writing & Content

Evergreen Social Calendar

Plan a capacity-aware social rhythm across channels, from content pillars to batching and evergreen recycling.

Writing & Content

Proof Point Packager

Turn approved evidence into reusable proof assets placed beside the claims they support.

Writing & Content

Brand Story Bank Builder

Turn interviews and case material into reusable, source-aware brand story units.

Writing & Content

Narrative Enablement Kit

Turn an approved brand canon into consistent elevator messaging, spokesperson answers, boilerplate, and language rules.

Writing & Content

Narrative Registry

Maintain one traceable, versioned source of truth for a brand’s narrative system.

Writing & Content

Narrative Resonance Monitor

Measures whether a brand narrative is echoed in market language, AI answers, and public signals.

Writing & Content

Pitch Narrative Builder

Turn an approved brand canon into an evidence-linked fundraising or sales deck narrative.

Writing & Content

Strategic Narrative Designer

Turn a market shift into a credible story from the old world to the promised land.

Writing & Content

Narrative Drift Monitor

Detects brand-message drift over time and identifies evidence-based triggers for repositioning.

Writing & Content

Channel Portfolio Planner

Choose an organic social portfolio that fits audience evidence, objectives, and team capacity.

Writing & Content

Brand Message System Architect

Build a durable brand hierarchy connecting the narrative, value pillars, proof points, tagline, and one-liner.

Related skills