Golden EPUB Keyword Classifier

The skill presents only static documentation summaries and reference files, with no visible credential access, external writes, covert data flow, or destructive behavior, so no red line is evident. However, it provides no source verification, sensitive-data handling, permission-boundary, or rollback guidance, so 10 points are deducted.

SKILL.md, the index, and the three reference files are broadly consistent on sections, code blocks, and statistics, but abnormal-input behavior is not described. There is no executable reproduction evidence for key paths, and the long code example is truncated in the summary, so 13 points are deducted.

The trigger is limited to “testing keyword categorization”; audience, non-fit boundaries, inputs, outputs, and semantic trigger precision are unspecified. Chinese-language support and mainland-China network reachability are not evidenced, so 11 points are deducted.

The skill has basic front matter, section overview, quick reference, reference navigation, and license context. It lacks installation guidance, versioning, changelog, maintenance ownership, update path, limitation disclosure, and troubleshooting detail, so 9 points are deducted.

It provides a readable summary of extracted test documentation, including examples, tables, and navigation, but it is not an independently executable conversion skill. Its repository-level description of converting websites, GitHub repositories, and PDFs does not match this EPUB keyword-categorization fixture, leaving limited directly usable value; 12 points are deducted.

The summary is linked to reference files with section markers and statistics, giving limited static auditability. There is no third-party execution evidence, key-path test coverage, or cross-source corroboration, so 7 points are deducted.