What does this skill do, and when should you use it?
This is a test-oriented skill in the Skill Seekers repository for the golden_pptx build. It describes an eight-slide engineering presentation titled “The Deck,” covering a quarterly architecture review with three sections, code examples, tables, and reference navigation. It is useful for checking whether PowerPoint extraction preserves expected metadata, structure, examples, and summaries. It is not documented as a general PowerPoint authoring or editing tool, and the SKILL.md does not provide a standalone installation or execution workflow.
Reports presentation metadata including title, author, subject, category, creation date, modification date, and slide count; lists sections, subsections, and content breakdown; summarizes Bash and Python examples with quality scores; records table contents, presentation statistics, language counts, and reference-file paths; and identifies use cases involving concepts, content review, code patterns, speaker notes, additional context, and table data.
- A test engineer validates that a Golden PPTX build preserves presentation metadata and the expected eight-slide count.
- An engineering reviewer scans the quarterly architecture review for its sections, key concepts, and configuration table.
- A developer looks up Bash or Python examples and implementation patterns extracted from the presentation.
- A content reviewer checks speaker-note context, presentation statistics, and reference-file navigation.
How do you install this skill?
- Do not treat this file as a complete PPTX-conversion skill; it is a golden-test artifact with truncated code and limited content.
- Before production use, add a clear input/output contract, failure handling, source validation, sensitive-data guidance, and dedicated key-path tests.
- The publisher is not verified by the FollowSkills enterprise registry; treat identity as unknown.
- Local filesystem
The repository README documents collection installation with pip install skill-seekers. It lists ~/.claude/skills/ as the global Claude Code skills path, but it does not document a dedicated packaging or installation procedure for tests/golden/phase2/pptx/SKILL.md; the exact copy step for this test skill is therefore unspecified.
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yusufkaraaslan/Skill_Seekers.git "$tmp"
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -R "$tmp/tests/golden/phase2/pptx" ~/.claude/skills/
rm -rf "$tmp"Generated from the source repository and skill path; it copies only this skill's folder. If the author's install steps above differ, follow those first. To scope it to one project, replace ~/.claude/skills with that project's .claude/skills.
How do you use this skill?
Provide the skill directory to an Agent Skills-compatible client and use it to review or validate a Golden PPTX build, including its metadata, sections, code examples, tables, or reference navigation. The SKILL.md defines no command, trigger phrase, or automation script.
What are this skill's strengths and limitations?
- Defines concrete test expectations such as eight slides, three sections, and two tables.
- Covers metadata, structure, code examples, statistics, and reference navigation in one profile.
- Includes Bash and Python examples with quality scores for extraction checks.
- Its content is a fixed golden-build fixture rather than a general-purpose PowerPoint assistant.
- The SKILL.md documents no execution logic, error handling, or external dependencies.
- One long Python example is truncated with an ellipsis in the supplied source and is not a complete code reference.
How does this skill compare with similar options?
Side by side with related skills; every score comes from the same FSRS standard.
| Skill | FS score | Stars | Last updated | License |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golden PPTX Presentation Test Skill this page | 28 · Not recommended | ★ 15k | 25d ago | MIT |
| Golden PPTX Keyword Categorization | 34 · Not recommended | ★ 15k | 25d ago | MIT |
| Scratchpad Example Extractor | 49 · Use with care | ★ 28k | 11d ago | MIT |
| PDF Chapter Classification Skill | 31 · Not recommended | ★ 15k | 25d ago | MIT |
| Azure Document Intelligence for TypeScript ✓ Microsoft · Official | 50 · Use with care | ★ 2.7k | 3mo ago | MIT |
How did FollowSkills review this skill?
The skill is a passive presentation extract with no evident malware, credential handling, or external side effects. However, it does not explain data flow, source validation, user confirmation, sensitive-data handling, or rollback, so points are deducted.
The SKILL.md and reference files are broadly consistent, but the code example is visibly truncated as “x3 ...” and there are no abnormal-input cases, failure feedback, or reproduction steps. Static evidence cannot establish a runnable key path, so the score remains low.
The trigger is limited to testing the pptx golden build; audience, inputs, outputs, non-fit boundaries, and semantic trigger precision are unspecified. It is a fixed fixture and provides no evidence of Chinese-language or mainland-China network fit, so points are deducted.
The skill has basic naming, description, section navigation, reference files, and statistics. Repository context supplies an MIT license and version metadata, but the skill itself lacks installation guidance, parameters, limitations, changelog, and maintenance ownership, so points are deducted.
It offers a limited summary of slides, tables, code, and notes, but it is clearly test-fixture content, includes a truncated example, and does not perform the repository's advertised documentation-conversion task. Direct usability of the output is unverified, warranting only a small score.
Reference files, slide ranges, statistics, and metadata provide limited internal traceability. There is no independent reproduction, third-party evidence, or dedicated key-path test coverage for this skill, leaving static evidence thin.
Open a dimension to read why it scored that way
Evidence confidence：Low — Mostly static review, author material or a limited demo; useful for discovery, not high-risk decisions.
See the full review method →