Productivity & Collaboration contract-generationlegal-documentsbusiness-agreementsplain-english-annotationsnda-alternativerisk-flagging

Business Agreement Generator

Turns a short Q&A into a complete business agreement with plain-English annotations — freelancer contracts, partnerships, SOWs, MSAs and more.

FollowSkills review · FSRS-2.0
Use with care
46/ 100 5-point scale 2.3 / 5
1 2 3 4 5 6
1Trust14 / 25 · 2.8/5

Pure prompt-driven skill: no credentials, no destructive operations, no network side effects; embedded legal disclaimers and attorney-review recommendations make data flow transparent. Deducted for: unverified publisher, unknown repository license metadata, no statement on handling of sensitive legal inputs (no data-retention/privacy note), and no rollback concept.

2Reliability10 / 20 · 2.5/5

Well-structured prompt: fixed information-gathering phase (questions 1-5 required), universal agreement template, type-specific clause inserts, deterministic file naming — happy path is plausible. Deducted for: static review cannot execute; no defined failure feedback for abnormal inputs (contradictory or invalid parameters); no tests or complete example outputs; many bracket placeholders ([15/30], [2/3/5] years) leave determinism to the user.

3Adaptability8 / 15 · 2.7/5

Clear invocation (/legal agreement <type>), ten well-bounded agreement types, clarification on unmatched types — good trigger precision. Deducted for: US-law defaults (IRS 1099, California non-compete notes, JAMS/AAA) with no declared jurisdictional boundaries; no Chinese-language support; limited fit for mainland-China users.

4Convention6 / 15 · 2.0/5

Well-layered docs: invocation, supported types, two-phase workflow, template plus type-specific clauses, output spec. Deducted for: unknown license, no version or changelog, no FAQ, no known-limitation disclosure (e.g., common-law/US-only applicability), unclear maintenance responsibility and update path; README is marketing-heavy (Skool community promotion) with weak governance signals.

5Effectiveness6 / 15 · 2.0/5

As a drafting aid, output structure is complete (15-section standard structure + type clauses + risk-level flags) with plain-English annotations and a fill-in checklist — some marginal value. Deducted for: static review cannot verify legal quality or direct usability of generated agreements; validity is jurisdiction-dependent with no third-party evidence; README claims like '60 seconds' are unverified marketing.

6Verifiability2 / 10 · 1.0/5

All content is author claims and embedded templates: no tests, no example generated outputs, no third-party execution evidence or cross-source corroboration. Per static calibration, only the lowest tier is awarded.

Evidence confidence:Low Reviewed Sep 09, 2026 Reviewed revision 19ece98df260
Before you use it
  • Generated agreements are not legal advice; a licensed attorney must review under the applicable jurisdiction before signing.
  • Templates default to US jurisdiction (1099, California non-compete rules, JAMS/AAA); substantial rework is needed for mainland China or other jurisdictions, and there is no Chinese-language support.
  • Repository license is unknown; confirm terms before commercial use.
  • Many placeholders (durations, percentages, state names) require manual completion; direct use carries legal risk.
  • Not execution-verified: all quality claims come from the author; this assessment is a static source review.
Review evidence [1][2]
See the full review method →

What does this skill do, and when should you use it?

This is one skill inside the 14-skill AI Legal Assistant collection for Claude Code, invoked via `/legal agreement <type>`. It first gathers structured details from the user (parties, scope, payment terms, duration), then drafts a full agreement with 15 standard sections, each annotated in plain English and flagged with red/yellow/green risk levels. Output is a named Markdown file plus a summary listing fill-in items and next steps. The generated document carries an explicit disclaimer that it is not legal advice and should be attorney-reviewed before signing.

Reads the /legal agreement <type> invocation and matches it against 10 supported types (freelancer-contract, partnership-agreement, service-agreement, licensing-agreement, consulting-agreement, sow, msa, joint-venture, distribution-agreement, referral-agreement). Works in phases: Phase 1 asks a numbered questionnaire (minimum questions 1-5: both parties, scope, payment, duration) plus type-specific follow-ups; Phase 2 drafts the agreement with purpose/recitals, scope, term and termination, compensation, IP, confidentiality, limitation of liability, indemnification, dispute resolution, force majeure, and signature blocks, inserting type-specific clauses (e.g., kill fee and revision limits for freelancer contracts, capital contributions and dissolution for partnerships). It saves the file as [TYPE]-AGREEMENT-[PartyA-PartyB]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md and outputs an overview, section list, [FILL IN] items, tiered risk reminders, and suggested next steps including running /legal review for risk analysis.

  1. A freelancer needs a contractor agreement with kill fee, revision limits, and IP assignment before starting a project
  2. Two small-business partners want a first-draft partnership agreement covering profit split, voting, and dissolution triggers
  3. A vendor under an existing MSA needs a project SOW with milestones, acceptance criteria, and a change-order process
  4. A software or content owner needs a licensing agreement specifying exclusivity, territory, and royalty structure
  5. An agency wants a referral agreement defining fee percentage, qualification criteria, and attribution windows

What are this skill's strengths and limitations?

Pros
  • Covers 10 common agreement types, each with tailored follow-up questions and custom clauses
  • Plain-English annotation on every section helps non-lawyers understand what they are signing
  • Built-in red/yellow/green risk flags, e.g., explicit warning that non-competes are unenforceable in California, Minnesota, Oklahoma, and North Dakota
  • Consistent 15-section structure including termination, confidentiality, liability caps, force majeure, and signature blocks
Limitations
  • Output is a template draft only; the skill itself insists on attorney review before signing
  • Does not produce PDF reports — that capability belongs to a sibling skill (legal-report-pdf), not this one
  • License is unknown, so commercial use terms are unverified
  • No test suite or sample outputs in the source to verify draft quality; governing law and jurisdiction are left as placeholders

How do you install this skill?

Install as part of the full collection: curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zubair-trabzada/ai-legal-claude/main/install.sh | bash installs all 14 skills, 5 agents, and PDF scripts. The skill file lives at skills/legal-agreement/SKILL.md in the repo. Manual steps for installing only this sub-skill are not documented in the source.

How do you use this skill?

In Claude Code, run /legal agreement <type> with a type from the supported list (e.g., /legal agreement freelancer-contract). Answer the numbered questions (at least 1-5 covering parties, scope, payment, and duration), optionally answering type-specific follow-ups. After generation, review the [FILL IN] placeholders and risk notes in the output file.

FAQ

Can I sign the generated agreement as-is?
No. The document includes a legal disclaimer requiring review by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction; clauses like non-competes may be void in some states.
Which agreement types does it generate?
Ten: freelancer/contractor, partnership, service, licensing, consulting, SOW, MSA, joint venture, distribution, and referral agreements. NDAs are handled by the separate `/legal nda` skill in the same repo.
Are there extra dependencies?
The skill itself needs only Claude Code. Python 3.8+ and reportlab are only needed for PDF generation, which is a different skill in the collection.
What if I skip some questions?
The skill is instructed not to draft until answers to at least questions 1-5 (parties, scope, payment, duration) are received; it will keep asking until then.

More skills from this repository

All from zubair-trabzada/ai-legal-claude

Dev & Engineering

Custom NDA Generator

Generate a complete, situation-tailored Non-Disclosure Agreement from one command, with plain English annotations on every section — no more piecing together templates.

Productivity & Collaboration

Plain English Contract Translator

Turns every clause of a contract from legalese into clear plain English, flagging deliberately confusing or misleading language.

Productivity & Collaboration

Terms of Service Generator (AI Legal Assistant)

Scans any website or SaaS product and drafts complete, GDPR/CCPA-compliant Terms of Service with plain-English summaries for every section.

Productivity & Collaboration

Counter-Proposal Generator

Flags every unfavorable contract clause and produces insert-ready replacement language, talking points, and a ready-to-send revision email.

Productivity & Collaboration

AI Legal Assistant (legal/SKILL.md Orchestrator)

One /legal command in Claude Code for contract review, risk scoring, NDA and terms generation, compliance checks, and PDF reports — replacing costly first-pass legal review.

Productivity & Collaboration

Freelancer Contract Review

Reviews contracts from the freelancer's perspective, flags common traps, scores fairness, and produces actionable negotiation scripts before you sign.

Productivity & Collaboration

Missing Protections Finder (AI Legal Assistant)

Scans a contract for protections that industry standards say should be there but aren't, then delivers ready-to-insert clause language with urgency ratings.

Dev & Engineering

Deep Risk Analysis (AI Legal Assistant Skill)

Clause-by-clause contract risk scoring (1-10), financial exposure estimates, and ready-to-use replacement clause language.

Productivity & Collaboration

AI Legal Assistant: Full Contract Review

One command launches five parallel AI agents to review a contract, producing a scored report with clause-by-clause risk analysis and negotiation priorities in under 60 seconds.

Productivity & Collaboration

Legal Analysis PDF Report Generator

Turns completed legal contract-review results into a polished branded PDF with score gauge, risk dashboard, and clause-by-clause analysis.

Productivity & Collaboration

Contract Comparison Skill

Clause-by-clause comparison of two contract versions, flagging every change, who it favors, and hidden risks before you sign.

Writing & Content

Privacy Policy Generator

Scans a website's actual data collection practices and generates a GDPR/CCPA-compliant privacy policy tailored to what it really finds.

Productivity & Collaboration

Compliance Gap Analysis

Scans any website and audits it against GDPR, CCPA, ADA/WCAG, PCI-DSS, CAN-SPAM, COPPA and SOC 2, producing a scored gap report with a remediation roadmap.

Related skills