Productivity & Collaboration contract-reviewcontract-negotiationcounter-proposalsclause-rewriterisk-analysislegal-documents

Counter-Proposal Generator

Flags every unfavorable contract clause and produces insert-ready replacement language, talking points, and a ready-to-send revision email.

FollowSkills review · FSRS-2.0
Not recommended
41/ 100 5-point scale 2.1 / 5
1 2 3 4 5 6
1Trust12 / 25 · 2.4/5

Pure prompt-based skill with least-privilege scope (reads user-specified files, optional WebFetch, writes one markdown file); prominent legal disclaimer included; no covert exfiltration or dangerous defaults. Deducted for: URL fetching without confirmation, unexplained data flow for sensitive contract text, no rollback/overwrite handling, unverified publisher identity.

2Reliability8 / 20 · 2.0/5

Instructions are self-consistent with clear steps; the happy path (file path or pasted text) is plausible. Deducted for: no tests or sample inputs/outputs, no error handling or failure feedback for unreachable URLs, missing files, empty or non-contract input; no evidence of deterministic clause identification quality.

3Adaptability8 / 15 · 2.7/5

Trigger is explicit (/legal negotiate <file>) and the scenario (pre-signing negotiation prep) is clear with a complete output structure. Deducted for: undeclared capability boundaries (jurisdiction, English-only assumption), no Chinese-language support, no statement of applicable contract types or non-fit ranges.

4Convention5 / 15 · 1.7/5

Documentation is well layered and templates are complete and readable. Deducted for: frontmatter name (counter-proposal-generator) inconsistent with directory (legal-negotiate) and README command; no versioning, changelog, known-limitation disclosure, FAQ, or license metadata.

5Effectiveness5 / 15 · 1.7/5

Promises directly usable replacement clauses, talking points, and an email template with concession strategy; some marginal value over manual drafting. Deducted for: static review cannot verify legal correctness of proposed clause language; high cost of legal errors means output will require attorney review, so direct-usability evidence is limited.

6Verifiability3 / 10 · 1.5/5

Only author-written instructions and templates; no tests, sample outputs, third-party execution evidence, or user corroboration. Auditable primary material is thin under static review, so the score stays low.

Evidence confidence:Low Reviewed Sep 09, 2026 Reviewed revision 19ece98df260
Before you use it
  • Output is informational only and not legal advice; all replacement clauses must be reviewed by a licensed attorney before signing.
  • URL fetching via WebFetch and contract processing send sensitive commercial text through the AI pipeline; use caution with confidential agreements.
  • Skill name (counter-proposal-generator) mismatches the command (legal-negotiate); rely on the README command.
  • No license or version metadata and unclear maintenance/update path; accuracy of clause identification and replacement language is unverified.
  • English-only with undeclared jurisdiction; not suitable for Chinese-language contracts or non-US/UK legal contexts.
Review evidence [1][2]
See the full review method →

What does this skill do, and when should you use it?

This is one of 14 skills in the AI Legal Assistant for Claude Code collection, located at skills/legal-negotiate/SKILL.md. Triggered by /legal negotiate <file>, it reads a contract file, pasted text, or URL and scans every clause for terms unfavorable to the user, rating each HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW risk. For each issue it produces the original quote, a plain-English problem statement, complete replacement clause text, a persuasive talking point, and an acceptance-likelihood estimate, grouped into MUST-CHANGE / SHOULD-CHANGE / NICE-TO-CHANGE tiers. The final output is a negotiation-strategy Markdown report with a concession strategy and a professional email template, and it explicitly disclaims legal advice.

Reads local contract files via the Read tool, fetches URLs via WebFetch, or uses pasted text; identifies contract type and parties; flags one-sided clauses, excessive liability, vague language, missing protections, and traps like auto-renewal, assigning HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW RISK; for each issue generates precise replacement clause text (not vague suggestions), collaborative talking points, and acceptance likelihood (High/Medium/Low); tiers findings into MUST-CHANGE, SHOULD-CHANGE, and NICE-TO-CHANGE with a suggested concession order; drafts a professional, non-adversarial revision email; and writes a NEGOTIATION-STRATEGY-[contract-name].md file.

  1. A freelancer preparing a prioritized list of clause changes and talking points before signing a client contract
  2. A small business owner who received a vendor contract and needs replacement wording for liability caps and auto-renewal terms
  3. An agency drafting a polished, sendable revision email to the counterparty's legal department
  4. A negotiator close to signing who needs a pre-planned concession order: what to give up first, what never to concede
  5. A contract party facing vague indemnification language who needs an insert-ready clause, not a generic recommendation

What are this skill's strengths and limitations?

Pros
  • Output is immediately usable: replacement clauses are written as complete, insert-ready text rather than vague advice like 'add a liability cap'
  • Three priority tiers plus an explicit concession order mirror real negotiation workflow, including strategic bargaining chips
  • Includes a professional, collaborative email template ready to send to the other party
  • Each proposal carries an acceptance-likelihood estimate to help anticipate pushback
  • Output includes a clear legal disclaimer, positioning the tool as informational rather than legal advice
Limitations
  • Not a lawyer and cannot replace review by a licensed attorney — the output itself repeats this repeatedly
  • Triggered only via the /legal negotiate slash command, which depends on Claude Code's command mechanism; other platforms require rework of the trigger
  • Acceptance-likelihood ratings are estimates with no stated calibration basis or test data
  • Repository has no stated license, so commercial-use terms are unclear
  • The body references Claude Code's Read and WebFetch tools; README metrics (60-second reviews, savings versus lawyer fees) are marketing claims without independent verification

How do you install this skill?

Install the full collection (this skill ships with it): curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zubair-trabzada/ai-legal-claude/main/install.sh | bash. This installs all 14 skills, 5 agents, and the PDF generation scripts. Standalone installation of this single skill is not documented; the license is unknown.

How do you use this skill?

In Claude Code, run /legal negotiate <file> where <file> is a local file path, pasted contract text, or a URL. The skill writes NEGOTIATION-STRATEGY-[contract-name].md in the input file's directory (or the current working directory for pasted text).

FAQ

Can it replace a lawyer?
No. The output carries a legal disclaimer stating it is not legal advice and creates no attorney-client relationship; a qualified attorney should review any contract before signing.
What inputs does it accept?
Three: a local file path (read via Read), a URL (fetched via WebFetch), or contract text pasted directly.
What does it cost?
The skill itself is free, but it requires Claude Code with an active Anthropic API key, so usage incurs model API costs.
What if the other party refuses my changes?
The report includes a concession strategy: concede NICE-TO-CHANGE items first, trade SHOULD-CHANGE items selectively, and treat MUST-CHANGE items as the non-negotiable bottom line.

More skills from this repository

All from zubair-trabzada/ai-legal-claude

Productivity & Collaboration

Missing Protections Finder (AI Legal Assistant)

Scans a contract for protections that industry standards say should be there but aren't, then delivers ready-to-insert clause language with urgency ratings.

Productivity & Collaboration

AI Legal Assistant (legal/SKILL.md Orchestrator)

One /legal command in Claude Code for contract review, risk scoring, NDA and terms generation, compliance checks, and PDF reports — replacing costly first-pass legal review.

Productivity & Collaboration

Contract Comparison Skill

Clause-by-clause comparison of two contract versions, flagging every change, who it favors, and hidden risks before you sign.

Productivity & Collaboration

Plain English Contract Translator

Turns every clause of a contract from legalese into clear plain English, flagging deliberately confusing or misleading language.

Dev & Engineering

Deep Risk Analysis (AI Legal Assistant Skill)

Clause-by-clause contract risk scoring (1-10), financial exposure estimates, and ready-to-use replacement clause language.

Productivity & Collaboration

AI Legal Assistant: Full Contract Review

One command launches five parallel AI agents to review a contract, producing a scored report with clause-by-clause risk analysis and negotiation priorities in under 60 seconds.

Productivity & Collaboration

Freelancer Contract Review

Reviews contracts from the freelancer's perspective, flags common traps, scores fairness, and produces actionable negotiation scripts before you sign.

Productivity & Collaboration

Business Agreement Generator

Turns a short Q&A into a complete business agreement with plain-English annotations — freelancer contracts, partnerships, SOWs, MSAs and more.

Productivity & Collaboration

Terms of Service Generator (AI Legal Assistant)

Scans any website or SaaS product and drafts complete, GDPR/CCPA-compliant Terms of Service with plain-English summaries for every section.

Dev & Engineering

Custom NDA Generator

Generate a complete, situation-tailored Non-Disclosure Agreement from one command, with plain English annotations on every section — no more piecing together templates.

Productivity & Collaboration

Legal Analysis PDF Report Generator

Turns completed legal contract-review results into a polished branded PDF with score gauge, risk dashboard, and clause-by-clause analysis.

Productivity & Collaboration

Compliance Gap Analysis

Scans any website and audits it against GDPR, CCPA, ADA/WCAG, PCI-DSS, CAN-SPAM, COPPA and SOC 2, producing a scored gap report with a remediation roadmap.

Writing & Content

Privacy Policy Generator

Scans a website's actual data collection practices and generates a GDPR/CCPA-compliant privacy policy tailored to what it really finds.

Related skills