Multica Squad Operations

The skill document explicitly states that all write operations (assign, comment, mention, activity, etc.) require explicit user authorization, and provides a list of side-effecting operations, demonstrating least privilege. It also offers a read-only debug command sequence to reduce accidental operations. However, there is a potential risk: the document says `multica squad activity` is a write operation but does not specify whether additional confirmation is needed; it relies on external `multica` CLI permission control without verification. No obvious overreach or covert behavior found, but permission enforcement lacks evidence. Deductions: Lack of explicit statement on sensitive data handling and data-flow transparency, and insufficient rollback and attribution verification.

The document is self-consistent, with command examples matching source file references, providing clear debug command sequences and error-handling guidance (e.g., 'check help if ambiguous', 'do not guess commands'). However, static review does not execute any commands, so command functionality cannot be verified. The source map lists corresponding test files indicating test coverage, but no concrete evidence of passing tests. Deductions: Since not executed, reliability capped at 10, and error handling lacks explicit failure-message templates.

The skill's purpose is clear: creating, inspecting, updating, assigning to, or debugging a Multica squad, and explains leader routing. The document provides clear boundaries: a squad is not an agent, routing goes to the leader not all members, and field semantics (e.g., `instructions` are leader briefing content, not member prompts). However, the trigger condition in frontmatter is broad ("when creating, inspecting, updating, assigning to, or debugging"), while the body emphasizes "inspect first", which may create semantic ambiguity. Also, no mention of Chinese-language support or mainland-China network reachability, though core functionality depends on a CLI that may be affected by network. Deductions: Trigger precision insufficient, environment fit evidence thin.

SKILL.md is well-structured with quick start, core model, CLI, field descriptions, common wrong assumptions, side effects, and references, using progressive disclosure via a references file. However, missing installation/dependency notes (how to obtain the `multica` CLI), versioning/changelog, FAQs, and comprehensive known-limitation disclosure. License metadata is NOASSERTION, and although the repo has a LICENSE file, applicability to the skill is unclear; no separate version number for the skill. Maintenance responsibility is not stated in the skill doc, though the repo has CI/CD. Deductions: Versioning and maintenance unclear, no FAQ or explicit known-limitations section.

The skill's objectives are clear with concrete commands and thorough field descriptions, enabling direct use. However, static review cannot verify output quality, and the document focuses on description and debugging, lacking complete examples or expected outputs. The repo README demonstrates product value, but the skill itself lacks evidence of marginal benefit over manual/alternatives. Deductions: No directly usable output examples and comparative-benefit evidence; static cap at 7.

The source map provides detailed source paths, line numbers, and test files, with internal bug numbers (e.g., MUL-3724, MUL-5811) and GH issue references, enhancing traceability. However, these are author-provided internal evidence without independent verification. CI workflows exist but do not show specific test results for this skill. Deductions: No third-party reproducible execution evidence; static cap at 5.